Curious Writer, The: Concise Edition, 4th Edition. Bruce Ballenger, Boise State University. © | Pearson. Share this page. Instructor’s Manual to accompany Ballenger, The Curious Writer, Fifth Edition, The When Bruce Ballenger wrote the first edition of this textbook, I had the. The 5e of The Curious Writer is now available. The new edition features a new chapter on “re-genre,” which shows students how to take a writing assignment.

Author: Fenrilar Mikajin
Country: Liberia
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Photos
Published (Last): 22 November 2012
Pages: 96
PDF File Size: 3.78 Mb
ePub File Size: 8.6 Mb
ISBN: 494-5-97995-581-8
Downloads: 10731
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Yozshukinos

Post hoc or false cause: There is nothing inevitable about this trend. It starts with knowing what your essay is about—your inquiry question and maybe your claim—and then revising to make every element of the draft focused on that question or assertion. Good for using with lower skill sets, but students with higher skill sets will find the work a bit mundane. Curipus your draft, you made a tentative commitment to your topic, hoping that you could shape it into something that might have meaning for someone other than you.

Discover Prime Book Box for Kids. New to This Edition. Images are writeg to find using search engines such as Google Image Search. Few would argue the positive effects of these technological advances.

Ballenget College Worth It?

“The Curious Writer” by Bruce Ballenger

But it would be misleading to suggest that these are driter only two possible positions on general education requirements in American universities. Opening Up Play around with some ideas first by using some of the following triggers for thinking-through-writing in your journal.


But why is it a good law? Test your ideas against your current opinions. One of the sneakiest ways to sidetrack reason in an argument is to misrepresent or ignore the actual position of an opponent. Top Reviews Most recent Top Reviews.

Curious Writer, The: Concise Edition, 4th Edition

A more common fallacy, however, is when we cite an expert to support a claim with- out acknowledging that many other experts disagree on the point. Questions for the Process of Reading to Write.

Reducing issues to two sides simplifies the choices. Develop a question that is focused enough to lead to a strong claim and convincing evidence. Are your sentences fluent and concise? But there is nothing magical about 13 years of education.

Earlier in this chapter, we explored three models for argument: Trivia About The Curious Writer. Very much of the expressivist ilk. Who offers a counterargument that you might wrifer to consider? What do you want to understand better? The more I teach from this curiosu, the more I like it.

The Curious Writer

What sur- prised you most about what you said in your fastwrite? Stephanie marked it as to-read Dec 20, Writsr Revision is a continual process—not a last step. But this is the way to deal with Saddam. What’s a good inquiry question?

Open Preview Weiter a Problem? But they said, Every law has exceptions. For example, it can do the following: This book is excellent and I would recommend it to both beginner and advanced writers.

Finding the Focusing Question. Do you agree with my argument? Shifting away from the substance of an argument to attack the person making it, either subtly or explicitly, is another common logical fallacy.


However, we can expect to be let down. Follow- ing the midterm elections inthere were plenty of causal arguments about why the Democrats did so poorly and the Republicans did so well. What is the history of the controversy? I am all for the rant about higher education costing a fortune.

For example, we frequently make a judgment about someone after just meeting him or her.

Structure Like any form of balkenger, the design of arguments depends on the situation. While a writer may have feelings, one way or another, about what the com- munity should think, it would be irresponsible not to inquire first into the debate, and this is often wonderfully complicated.

It’s an incredible resource for users of the book. Rented it for my ENG1O1 class. What is the balance between explaining what I think bruxe presenting evidence to support it?

I love the essay structures taught in this book, from the profile to the proposal to my favorite of all, the ethnography.

Instead of two sides to every issue, might there be thirteen?

Read reviews that mention curious writer learn how to write highly recommend english class concise edition really good useful information excellent condition book came great price writing skills book for an english good book book for a good writing my own book ballenger textbook students text essay. PaperbackConcise, Third Editionpages. Which do you find most convincing?