[Act 23 of ]. Preamble. An Act to define, amend and consolidate the law relating to chitties in the State of Kerala;. WHEREAS it is expedient to define, amend. RBI prepared a Draft Bill. The Kerala Chitties Act. The Chit Funds Act. The laws relating to chitties in force of Kerala State. appellant was that the plaintiff has violated the Kerala Chitties Act, and contended that there was no previous sanction Government as required under .

Author: Dara Vigore
Country: Paraguay
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Marketing
Published (Last): 4 April 2009
Pages: 96
PDF File Size: 6.62 Mb
ePub File Size: 17.14 Mb
ISBN: 468-3-92190-505-9
Downloads: 48057
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Kagalabar

The Kerala Chitties Act 1 Complete Act – Citation – Bare Act | LegalCrystal

Provision shall also be made in the variola that veethapalisa shall be istributed. Any foreman who contravenes the provisions of sub-section 4 shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three months and with fine which may extend to five hundred rupees.

Thus, according to the learned counsel, repugnancy arose when the Central Chit Funds Act, received the assent of the President and on its publication in the Official Gazette and not on kerala chitties act commencement, which till date is not there in the State of Kerala. India Intelligent legal information. State of Karnataka reported in Supp.

Rishikesh supra has been correctly decided. Thus, on such commencement of the Central Chit Funds Act,the transactions chits between Chitty when to be wound up. Transfer of rights of foreman when voidable. This sub-section was inserted to plug a loophole.

Provided further that before refusing to register a chitty, the foreman krrala be given an chittiws of being heard. Insolvency or liquidation a bar to winding up proceedings. Consequently, laws made by a Legislature may be void not only for lack of legislative powers in respect of the subject-matter, but also for transgressing constitutional limitations. Removal of defaulting subscribers. On a comparison of the various provisions in the Chit Funds Act and the Kerala Chitties Act we have come across several such inconsistent and hostile provisions ,erala are sic repugnant to each other.


Thus, it is noticeable that throughout Article the emphasis is on law-making by the respective Legislatures. Singh, kerala chutties act the bringing into force or commencement of the Acy Act was irrelevant in considering repugnancy under Article 1and that the repugnancy arose when the State law came into conflict with the enactment of the Central law, even when the Central law is not brought into force in the State of Kerala.

Provided that the previous Provided that a sanction obtained sanction under this sub-section under this sub-section shall lapse shall lapse unless the chitty is if the chit is not registered registered before the expiry of within twelve months from the date six months from the date of such of such sanction or within such sanction: Penalty for false statement.

Provided that no person shall conduct such a chitty except under a permit issued by such authority and in accordance with such terms and conditions as may be prescribed by the Government: This chittiez the controversy which came before this Court. By reason of Article of the Constitution, the General Clauses Act, however, applies to the said repeal.

That section does not help the petitioner at all. If by reason of the subsequent enactment, the Legislature intended to abrogate or wipe off the former enactment, wholly or in part, then, it would be a case of pro tanto repeal.

That, until such notification neither the Kerala Chitties Chittifs, prevails in the State of Kerala as it has become void and stands repealed under Article 1 nor the Central Chit Funds Act, as it is not notified. The respective Lists merely demarcate the legislative fields or legislative heads.

Blog Stats 2, hits. Inspection of documents in Registrar’s Office. One more aspect needs to be highlighted.

Kerala Chitties Act, – Indian Bare Act / Law / Statute / Kanoon – LawyerServices

Chandra Rani and others keraka. Every transfer by a non. If one reads the Head Note to Article it refers to power of the Parliament to legislate with respect to any matter in the State List if a Proclamation of Emergency is in operation. The lis in the present case arose under the following circumstances.



Power to enter and search any place and to seize documents, etc. Provided that nothing in this clause qct prevent Parliament from enacting at any time any law with respect to the same matter including a law adding to, amending, varying or repealing the law so made by the Legislature of the State. List Judgments keralz this Act.

The crucial date in the case of the said two enactments would be the dates when they received the assent of the President, which in the case of the Central Act was 9.

No explanation, much less a satisfactory explanation, has been rendered by the accused persons in their statements under Section Cr.

However, as the Kerala Act, stood repealed on The point to be noted is that the law-making process ended on In the said judgment, this Court also referred to three tests of inconsistency or repugnancy enumerated by Nicholas in his commentary on Australian Constitution, 2nd Edition, Page Other documents of interest: It is, therefore, obvious that in such matters repugnancy may result from the following circumstances:.

Moreover the legislative business of making law entailing with valuable public time and enormous expenditure would not be made to depend on the volition of the executive to notify the commencement of the Act. This being the position, the validity of the notification issued on under Section 1 3the reference of the case of the petitioner, the appointment of Respondent 1 as the authorised official and all proceedings under the Travancore Act 14 of cannot be questioned on the ground that the Act lapsed and was not continued by Ordinance 1 of